Comparison
Tapeline vs MarketSmith — when transparency matters.
MarketSmith is the institutional pedigree — IBD's Composite Rating, 40+ years of CAN SLIM methodology, deep chart annotations. Tapeline is the transparent newcomer — published 6-factor formula, sub-60s scoring, a public scorecard with every pick back-checked. Pick the second one if you want methodology you can audit and a price you can actually pay monthly.
- Free forever tier — no card
- 14-day Premium trial — no card, nothing charged
- Pro from $8.25/mo · $99.00/yr
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Where Tapeline wins
| Feature | Tapeline | MarketSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Published scoring formula | ✓ Six named factors on /how-it-works | Not published — Composite Rating weighting is proprietary |
| Public per-pick scorecard | ✓ Daily top-10 back-checked vs SPY, no edits | Aggregate IBD 50 performance disclosed; no per-pick daily public log |
| Sub-60s live scoring | ✓ Every tick during market hours | End-of-day updates; intraday data on charts but ratings refresh daily |
| Plain-English Why on every row | ✓ Default sentence per ticker | Not available — composite rating + chart annotations only |
| Congressional trades feed | ✓ House + Senate disclosed trades (Premium) | Not available — MarketSmith focuses on price + fundamental ratings |
| Recent insider buys (SEC Form 4) | ✓ Live Form 4 across ~2,500 tickers (Premium) | Accumulation/Distribution rating present; no direct Form 4 feed |
| Annual subscription cost | $99/yr (Pro) · $199/yr (Premium) | $899/yr (basic MarketSmith) |
Honest tradeoffs
Where MarketSmith has an edge — explained so you can pick what matters for your workflow.
Industry / sector group analysis
MarketSmith's industry group analysis (197 IBD industries with leadership ranking) is more granular than Tapeline's 11 GICS sectors + 3 Tapeline buckets. If your workflow depends on identifying leading industries before stocks within them, MarketSmith has the edge there. Tapeline collapses to GICS to keep the heatmap usable on one screen.
Chart annotation depth
MarketSmith's chart engine has 30+ years of IBD-specific annotations (base counts, pivot points, RS line). Tapeline embeds TradingView for charting — universal indicator set but without the IBD-style overlays. CAN SLIM purists will prefer MarketSmith's chart language.
Brand + community
IBD / MarketSmith has decades of brand equity and a deep educational corpus (William O'Neil's books, MarketSchool, IBD videos). Tapeline is new, transparency-focused, and publishes a public scorecard. Different stages of the same kind of product.
Try the live scanner free.
Free forever tier — no card. Pro from $8.25/mo ($99.00/yr), with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Or read the methodology.
Tapeline vs MarketSmith — questions
Is Tapeline a MarketSmith alternative?
+
Yes. Both are dedicated scoring tools (not broker-bundled scanners) targeting retail traders who want a synthesised answer. Tapeline names all six factors and shows each one's contribution per ticker; MarketSmith's CAN SLIM-based ranks are proprietary. Tapeline is $8.25/mo annual; MarketSmith is ~$74.95/mo. Most users who've run both report the methodology transparency + the public scorecard as the deciding factor.
How is the Tapeline score different from MarketSmith's RS Rating or Composite Rating?
+
MarketSmith's Composite Rating blends multiple sub-ratings (EPS, RS, Industry, Sales+Margins+ROE, Accumulation/Distribution) into a 0–99 score using a proprietary weighting. Tapeline's composite is 0–100 with all six factors named and their weighting ordered publicly: Trend and Relative Strength weighted most, Momentum least, with Fundamentals, Smart Money, and Macro in between. Same shape of output; different weighting transparency.
How does the pricing compare?
+
MarketSmith is approximately $74.95/mo (basic plan) or $174.95/mo (full version with industry charts). Tapeline Pro is $8.25/mo annual ($99/yr); Premium is $16.58/mo annual ($199/yr). Tapeline Premium at the annual rate is under a quarter of the cost of MarketSmith basic — and adds Congressional trades, insider Form 4, unlimited Telegram alerts.
Does MarketSmith publish a scorecard?
+
MarketSmith publishes IBD's '50 Stocks to Watch' lists with periodic performance reviews, but no per-pick daily back-check against SPY in the public domain. Tapeline auto-publishes every top-10 daily pick at /scorecard with the next-session realised return + alpha vs SPY — and we don't edit it.
Is CAN SLIM still effective in 2026?
+
Tapeline doesn't endorse or refute CAN SLIM — that's IBD's framework. What Tapeline can show: the composite has factor overlap with CAN SLIM (RS, fundamentals, accumulation patterns) but synthesises them differently and into a 0–100 score that updates sub-60s. If you're a long-time CAN SLIM follower, you'll recognise the factor inputs; the difference is the transparency of how they're combined.
Comparison data verified 2026-05-20. Competitor pricing and feature claims sourced from their public pages. Spot a mistake? Tell us — we update within 48 hours.
Compare Tapeline to another tool
We’ve published side-by-side comparisons against the 17 tools traders most commonly evaluate Tapeline against. Pick yours — each comparison includes pricing, scoring methodology, scorecard transparency, and the categories where the competitor honestly wins.
- Tapeline vs Benzinga ProNewsroom-grade headlines
- Tapeline vs Bloomberg TerminalInstitutional terminal
- Tapeline vs Finviz EliteRaw screener fields
- Tapeline vs KoyfinBloomberg-style data
- Tapeline vs RobinhoodCommission-free broker
- Tapeline vs Seeking AlphaCrowd-sourced analysis
- Tapeline vs Simply Wall StSnowflake visualisation
- Tapeline vs Stock RoverLong-term fundamentals
- Tapeline vs StockChartsCharting + alerts
- Tapeline vs TipRanksAnalyst consensus
- Tapeline vs Trade IdeasIntraday AI signals
- Tapeline vs TradingViewCharting + community
- Tapeline vs WallStreetZen115-factor Zen Rating
- Tapeline vs WebullMobile-first broker
- Tapeline vs Yahoo FinanceFree fundamental data
- Tapeline vs Zacks PremiumEarnings-revision rank
Don’t see your tool? Tell us — we publish a new comparison every two weeks based on requests.